Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 85033151, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 85033151 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung C&T Corporation
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed May 07, 2010
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was abandoned by Samsung C&T Corporation, a corporation organized in Korea, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of services in classes 035, 036, 039, 041, 043, 044 and 045, including advertising, insurance, transportation, education, hospitality, medical care and security services. A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in any of those service categories, especially where the goods or services overlap with those listed. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG.” No enforcement actions, oppositions or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on November 18, 2013. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad service coverage still suggests a potential concern if the new use falls within those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.