Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOTONE, serial 85043588, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOTONESerial 85043588 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: MJC SUPPLY LLC
Class 011 -
Filed May 20, 2010
The record shows that the ECOTONE application is dead – it was abandoned on August 1 2011 because the owner, MJC SUPPLY LLC, a California limited‑liability company, never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The filing covered only International Class 011 and listed a fairly specific set of HVAC‑related items such as air‑cleaning units, air conditioners, dehumidifiers, electric fans, patio heaters, radiant heaters, electric refrigerators, industrial air purifiers, water coolers and window‑mounting air‑conditioners. A later use of “ECOTONE” for products in that same class would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The prosecution history shows the usual steps of examination, amendment and issuance of a Notice of Allowance, but the mark never progressed to registration because no use evidence was submitted. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on August 1 2011, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market HVAC or air‑treatment equipment under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.