Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 85049229, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 85049229 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 27, 2010
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was abandoned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry items such as bracelets, rings, and watches (Class 014), a broad array of construction and repair services (Class 037), various communication services such as cable television and cellular telephone services (Class 038), and scientific and technology services like computer programming and architectural design (Class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed categories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The latest status event was the abandonment notice on April 14, 2014. Because the mark is no longer active, the risk of infringement is lower, but the broad historical coverage suggests that use in any of the listed goods or services could still trigger a concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.