Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 85049233, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 85049233 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 27, 2010
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” was abandoned on April 14 2014 because the owner, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered and is not live. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry items such as bracelets, rings, and watches (Class 014), a broad array of construction and repair services (Class 037), various communication services such as cellular telephone and satellite transmission (Class 038), and scientific and technology services like computer programming and architectural design (Class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these specific goods and services, especially the communication and technology areas. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is shown in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice in April 2014. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is not currently protected, but the broad goods and services listed still represent a potential area of concern if used in those fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.