Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 85049236, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 85049236 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 27, 2010
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead and was abandoned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a corporation organized in Korea, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance in 2011. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services, including jewelry items such as bracelets, rings, and watches (class 014), various construction and repair services (class 037), a broad array of communication services such as cable television and cellular telephone services (class 038), and scientific and technology services like computer programming and architectural design (class 042). Because the mark was never registered, this history does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung.” The prosecution history shows a series of extensions granted up to September 2013, but no further action was taken, leading to abandonment in April 2014. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied record, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be in the jewelry, communication, or technology sectors, and the abandoned status suggests a lower risk, though the mark’s broad description still signals potential similarity in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.