Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOONE, serial 85057269, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOONESerial 85057269 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: NEXGRID, LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 08, 2010
Registered Nov 29, 2011
The record shows that ECOONE is a live Principal Register service mark owned by NEXGRID, LLC, a Virginia limited‑liability company, and it has been renewed as of August 12 2021. The registration covers “providing on‑line non‑downloadable computer software for monitoring, managing and securing energy in the public utilities, gas utilities, electric utilities and water utilities industries; providing on‑line non‑downloadable computer software for data collection applications, namely, distribution automation and demand‑side management applications; and providing on‑line non‑downloadable computer software for database management used for receiving and monitoring energy usage information from multiple remote commodity meters in the public utilities, gas utilities, electric utilities and water utilities industries.” A similar name used for software or services in the energy‑utility sector would raise the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ECOONE in other fields. The prosecution history shows no refusals or supplemental‑register amendments, and the latest meaningful event is the 2021 renewal; no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same technology‑for‑utilities space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.