Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INSIDIOUS, serial 85077699, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDIOUSSerial 85077699 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Massey, James
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jul 03, 2010
Registered May 01, 2012
The record shows that INSIDIOUS is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by James Massey; the registration was cancelled on Dec 7 2018 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The protection that existed covered clothing – specifically tops, bottoms, underwear, footwear, headwear, dresses, jackets, coats, belts, neckwear, beachwear, and sleepwear – so a later use of the same word on similar apparel would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses on unrelated goods would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “insidious.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the normal allowance, statement‑of‑use filings and the eventual Section 8 cancellation. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation notice on Dec 7 2018, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations beyond this or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a clothing line with the same name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.