Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CALI FLOWER, serial 85143230, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CALI FLOWERSerial 85143230 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Dancing Ducks Entertainment, LLC
Class 028 -
Filed Oct 01, 2010
The record shows that the mark “CALI FLOWER” is dead on the Principal Register, having been abandoned because the owner, Dancing Ducks Entertainment, LLC, failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark covered children’s toys, including plush dolls, action figures, puppets, and related play accessories. A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in those toy categories, especially plush or stuffed toys and related play sets. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned registration’s scope. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in August 2011, followed by a Notice of Allowance in May 2012, and a single Statement of Use extension granted in November 2012 before abandonment in June 2013. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific toy goods listed remain the most relevant area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.