Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PASSION, serial 85218570, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PASSIONSerial 85218570 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: HTC Corporation
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jan 14, 2011
The record shows the “PASSION” application is dead – it was abandoned on August 4 2014 because no Statement of Use or timely extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is HTC Corporation, a corporation organized in Taiwan. The filing covered Class 009 goods described as mobile phones, smartphones, cellular phones, portable computers, personal digital assistants and wireless handheld digital electronic devices for communicating, recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, storing and reviewing text, data, image and audio files; a later‑stage use of “PASSION” on similar electronic devices would be the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give HTC control over every possible use of the word “PASSION,” especially outside the narrow electronic‑device scope shown. This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply reflects the allowance and subsequent abandonment rather than any register shift. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice in August 2014, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to brand electronic communication devices with the same name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.