Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR JEAN, serial 85233374, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANOR JEANSerial 85233374 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Eleanor Jean Inc.
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Feb 03, 2011
The record shows that the mark ELEANOR JEAN is abandoned, with the last status change on August 6 2012 when the USPTO mailed an abandonment notice because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance; the owner listed is Eleanor Jean Inc., a California corporation. The application covered only “beauty salons” in International Class 044, so a later use of the same wording in the same type of personal‑care service would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated fields such as clothing or food would be farther from the scope shown here. Because the registration never entered the Principal Register and was never issued, the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Eleanor Jean.” The prosecution history shows the application proceeded through examination, was published for opposition, received a Notice of Allowance, and then was abandoned for lack of use. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a beauty‑salon brand with the same name, but the risk drops sharply for other industries.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.