Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DIGITALLY CREATED IMAGE INCLUDING WORDS "FREQUENT BITER OF LOVE" WITH THE LETTER "O" IN "LOVE" REPLACED BY A PEACE SYMBOL AND THE LETTER "V" IN LOVE REPLACED BY A HEART, serial 85274669, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DIGITALLY CREATED IMAGE INCLUDING WORDS "FREQUENT BITER OF LOVE" WITH THE LETTER "O" IN "LOVE" REPLACED BY A PEACE SYMBOL AND THE LETTER "V" IN LOVE REPLACED BY A HEARTSerial 85274669 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Share the Love LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed
The record shows the application for “FREQUENT BITER OF LOVE” is dead; it was refused and void because the USPTO determined the filing never met the minimum filing‑date requirements, and the serial number was assigned in error. The owner listed is Share the Love LLC, a Massachusetts limited‑liability company, and the only goods covered are clothing items such as aprons, baby bodysuits, caps, bibs, boxer shorts, hooded sweatshirts, t‑shirts, tank tops and similar apparel. Because the claim is limited to those clothing categories, a similar phrase used for, say, a restaurant or a software service would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history contains only the entry of a new application on March 26 2011 and the status date of March 29 2011; no later maintenance or renewal dates are provided, and there are no recorded oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market clothing under a comparable name, since the record already reflects a rejected claim in that exact product class.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.