Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SANITEX PLUS RT, serial 85291295, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SANITEX PLUS RTSerial 85291295 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Crosstex International, Inc.
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Apr 11, 2011
The record shows that “SANITEX PLUS RT” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after no Statement of Use or extension was filed following the Notice of Allowance, with the abandonment notice dated June 23 2014; the owner listed is Crosstex International, Inc., a New York corporation. The filing covered Class 005 pharmaceuticals, specifically “germicide in spray form; disposable wipes impregnated with disinfecting germicide for use by medical professionals in hospitals, medical laboratories and doctors’ and dentists’ offices.” A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern in that same medical‑disinfection niche, but the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Sanitex” or “Plus.” This was a Principal Register filing, not a Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history shows only the usual extensions of time for a Statement of Use before the final abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signals appear. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market germicidal products to medical settings under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.