Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS, serial 85365002, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LANGUAGE OF FLOWERSSerial 85365002 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: L.O.F.T.M., INC.
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jul 07, 2011
The record shows that “LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on March 16 2015 because the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice that same day; the owner listed is L.O.F.T.M., INC., a North Carolina corporation. The application covered only Class 025, a very long list of clothing and related accessories such as ski boots, ankle socks, dancer apparel, baby garments, beachwear, artificial flower headdresses and many other apparel items. A similar name used for clothing or related accessories would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields (for example, software or food) fall farther from the scope shown here. The mark was on the Principal Register, not the Supplemental Register, so the prosecution history does not include a descriptiveness refusal followed by a supplemental filing. The most recent meaningful event is the abandonment notice on March 16 2015, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for clothing, but the record does not extend to other product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.