Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PASSION EMO T, serial 85384606, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PASSION EMO TSerial 85384606 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Kozyrev, Vladislav
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 29, 2011
The record shows that PASSION EMO T, filed by Vladislav Kozyrev as an intent‑to‑use application, is now abandoned – the USPTO mailed an abandonment notice on Nov 23 2015 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never entered on the Supplemental Register; it remained on the Principal Register throughout prosecution, with the examiner’s amendment and a series of extensions of time for a Statement of Use before the final abandonment. The goods and services listed span many classes, most notably cosmetics and cleaning (Class 003), electrical and scientific apparatus (Class 009), paper goods and printed matter (Class 016), clothing (Class 025), communication services (Class 038), education and entertainment (Class 041) and scientific‑technology services (Class 042). A similar name used for products or services in any of those categories would present the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those areas are farther from the scope shown. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a comparable mark in the listed fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.