Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JULIUS STYLES, serial 85386776, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JULIUS STYLESSerial 85386776 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Maandi Park MS, LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Aug 02, 2011
The record shows that the mark “JULIUS STYLES” is dead, having been abandoned after a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The owner listed is Maandi Park MS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The mark was filed on August 2, 2011 on an intent‑to‑use basis and was published for opposition on February 7, 2012. The goods listed are clothing, including shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, blouses, jerseys, pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, swimwear, loungewear, sleepwear, underwear, boxer shorts, socks, scarves, gloves, mittens, coats, jackets, belts, headwear, and footwear. Because the mark was registered on the Principal Register, the closest area of concern would be any use of a similar name for apparel or related accessories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specified goods. No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment on January 29, 2013. For someone considering a similar name, this history suggests a meaningful concern for apparel and related items, but the mark no longer protects the name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.