Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LILY PAD, serial 85497407, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LILY PADSerial 85497407 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: LIGHT IRON DIGITAL, LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Dec 16, 2011
Registered Nov 27, 2012
The record shows the “LILY PAD” mark is cancelled, not live, and was owned by LIGHT IRON DIGITAL, LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company; its registration on the Principal Register was cancelled on June 28 2019 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The goods listed in class 009 cover a fairly technical set of computer‑related items – mobile tower carts for computers, data processors, high‑speed storage subsystems, video monitors, power‑supply units, and related hardware and software for data compression, color correction and video monitoring – so a similar name used for comparable electronic or scientific apparatus would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Lily Pad,” especially outside those described goods. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the normal allowance, registration and later cancellation steps. The only notable status event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2019, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a mark for similar computer‑hardware or software products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.