Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for YEN TOT HON SUC KHOE TGOT HON BAN KHOE HON, serial 85532125, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
YEN TOT HON SUC KHOE TGOT HON BAN KHOE HONSerial 85532125 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Benevolence Food Products, LLC.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Filed Feb 02, 2012
Registered Sep 18, 2012
The record shows a cancelled Principal Register registration (serial 85532125, registration 4209470) that was owned by Benevolence Food Products, LLC, a California limited‑liability company; the cancellation was entered on April 19 2019 because the owner failed to file a proper Section 8 declaration. The only goods listed are “edible bird’s nests” in International Class 029 (Meats & Processed Foods), so a later use of the same or a similar phrase in that narrow food category would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated classes would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner any blanket control over the wording in all contexts. The prosecution history shows the mark cleared examination, was published for opposition on July 3 2012, and was registered on September 18 2012 before the later Section 8 cancellation; no enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market edible bird‑nest products under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.