Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS KL, serial 85540387, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS KLSerial 85540387 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Karmaloop, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Feb 11, 2012
The record shows that “MISS KL” is an abandoned Principal Register service mark owned by Karmaloop, Inc.; the abandonment notice was mailed on Dec 21 2015 after no Statement of Use was filed following the Notice of Allowance. The filing covered Class 035 online retail store services for clothing, footwear, accessories, toys, housewares, books, magazines, art and electronics, plus related event‑arranging and review‑site services, and also classes 041, 042 and 045 for entertainment‑focused websites, technology‑enabled sharing platforms and online social networking about fashion and popular culture. A similar name used in any of those online retail or fashion‑related contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not control every possible use of the words “MISS KL” outside those listed services. The prosecution history shows the mark progressed to a Notice of Allowance in Nov 2012 and then received multiple extensions of time to file a Statement of Use before ultimately being abandoned. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable online fashion or retail brand.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.