Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LUCHA VAVOOM, serial 85547891, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LUCHA VAVOOMSerial 85547891 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Lucha Vavoom LLC
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 21, 2012
Registered Oct 09, 2012
The record shows that LUCHA VAVOOM is a live Principal Register service mark owned by Lucha Vavoom LLC, a California limited‑liability company, and it has been renewed as of April 22, 2023. The registration covers “Entertainment in the nature of live theatrical productions” in International Class 041, with a first use date of June 2001 and a use‑in‑commerce date of August 22, 2001, so a similar name used for theater, concerts, or other live performance services would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Lucha” or “Vavoom” outside that specific entertainment context. The prosecution history shows the mark proceeded through normal examination, received an examiner’s amendment in June 2012, and was entered on the Principal Register in October 2012, with no supplemental‑register steps involved. The latest meaningful event is the 2023 Section 8/9 renewal, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a live‑theater brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.