Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CARTOON NETWORK GO, serial 85554796, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CARTOON NETWORK GOSerial 85554796 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: THE CARTOON NETWORK, INC.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 28, 2012
The record shows that the mark “CARTOON NETWORK GO” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, The Cartoon Network, Inc., never filed a Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was filed as a service mark on February 28, 2012, and the goods and services listed are entertainment services in the nature of providing entertainment programs and content, including on‑going television programs, clips, graphics and information relating to television programs in the fields of comedy, drama, action, variety, adventure, sports, musical, current events, entertainment news, documentary and animation, delivered via the internet, electronic communications networks, computer networks and wireless communications networks. Because the mark covered only these entertainment‑related services, a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown, but the record does not give control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a series of extensions granted up to July 20, 2015, after which the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use, leading to abandonment on February 29, 2016. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement signal. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern is the abandoned entertainment‑service mark, and while the mark is no longer active, the wording remains protected in that specific context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.