Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PENNY PINE, serial 85568291, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PENNY PINESerial 85568291 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 13, 2012
The record shows that the mark “PENNY PINE” is dead, having been abandoned after the owner, IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED, failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was applied for as a service mark on March 13, 2012 and was published for opposition on October 20, 2015. The goods and services listed are reforestation services, forestry management and consulting, and related promotional activities, as well as contests to win educational funds and resources tied to absorbent paper products. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of forestry management, environmental consulting, or educational contests involving paper products. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only covers the specific services listed. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The last status event was the abandonment notice on July 18, 2016. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific services listed still represent a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.