Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS, serial 85591487, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LANGUAGE OF FLOWERSSerial 85591487 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: L.O.F.T.M., INC.
Class 004 -
Filed Apr 06, 2012
The record shows that “LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS” is a dead mark owned by L.O.F.T.M., INC., a corporation organized in North Carolina. The mark was filed on April 6, 2012 on an intent‑to‑use basis and was abandoned on November 23, 2015 because the owner never filed a Statement of Use or an extension request after the Notice of Allowance. The goods listed are a wide range of candles and related items, including aromatherapy fragrance candles, beeswax candles, candle‑making kits, and decorative tabletop torches. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the candle and lighting product area, especially where the goods are sold for illumination or decoration. The record does not give the owner control over all uses of the phrase, only over the specific candle‑related goods listed. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The practical risk for someone considering a similar name is that using it for candles or related lighting products could create a meaningful concern, while use in unrelated categories would be farther from the record’s scope.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.