Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MRX, serial 85615418, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MRXSerial 85615418 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: WORLDDOC, INC.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 03, 2012
The record shows that the mark “MRX” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, WORLDDOC, INC., failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was applied for as a service mark on May 3, 2012 and was published for opposition on November 11, 2014. It covers software‑as‑a‑service offerings in class 042, specifically hosting software for physicians and healthcare providers that allows prescribing and recommending health‑related digital content, as well as online non‑downloadable software that retrieves and displays data from patients’ mobile health applications. A similar name used for services that fall within this narrow healthcare‑software niche would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on February 8, 2016. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific healthcare‑software services remain a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.