Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for STIR CRAZY FAMILY FUN CENTRE, serial 85618773, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
STIR CRAZY FAMILY FUN CENTRESerial 85618773 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Stir Crazy Family Fun Inc.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed May 07, 2012
The record shows that the mark “STIR CRAZY FAMILY FUN CENTRE” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Stir Crazy Family Fun Inc., a corporation organized in Canada, and the mark was filed on May 07 2012 under an intent‑to‑use basis with a foreign registration basis. The only class listed is 041, covering the operation of an entertainment centre for children and parents, including a games room, cupcake counter, playground, ice‑cream shop, party rooms, a parent and tot lounge, a private nursery room, and the sale of party packages, cake pan rentals, knee pad rentals, loot bags, balloons, and food platters. Because the record is limited to this specific set of services, a similar name used in unrelated industries would be farther from the scope shown, but the record does not grant control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a typical sequence of non‑final action and abandonment, with no evidence of enforcement activity. For anyone considering a similar name, the closest concern would arise if the new use involves a similar entertainment‑centre service; otherwise the risk is lower but not eliminated.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.