Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FUNKY, serial 85639725, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FUNKYSerial 85639725 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Nicholas Enterprises, Inc.
Class 033 -
Filed May 31, 2012
The record shows that the mark “FUNKY” was abandoned and is no longer active. The owner listed is Nicholas Enterprises, Inc., a corporation organized in California. The mark was filed on May 31 2012 on an intent‑to‑use basis and was published for opposition on November 6 2012. It was granted a Notice of Allowance on January 1 2013, but the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension request, leading to abandonment on February 3 2014. The goods covered are alcoholic beverages, including liqueurs, distilled spirits, and prepared cocktails, all in class 33. Because the record only covers these alcoholic products, a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be farther from the specific scope shown, though the exact wording remains a concern in that category. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest record‑based concern lies in the alcoholic beverage market, and the abandonment does not erase the potential risk of confusion within that class.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.