Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for EMC 2 = B E A U T Y EVERYTHING MAKEUP COSMETICS TIMES TWO, serial 85643940, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EMC 2 = B E A U T Y EVERYTHING MAKEUP COSMETICS TIMES TWO
Serial 85643940 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Kenig, Todd David
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Jun 05, 2012

The record shows that the application for EMC 2 = B E A U T Y E V E R Y T H I N G M A K E U P C O S M E T I C S T I M E S T W O is dead, having been abandoned on Aug 17 2015 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued; the owner listed is Todd David Kenig, an individual. The registration covered only Class 003 cosmetics, specifically shadows, lipsticks, lip pencils, eye pencils, mascara, blushes, adhesive eye lashes, nail polish and nail polish remover, so a similar name used on comparable makeup products would be the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “beauty” or “makeup” in other categories. This was a Principal Register filing; the prosecution history shows the application moved from allowance to a series of Statement‑of‑Use extensions before the final abandonment, but no supplemental‑register step appears. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on Aug 17 2015, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market cosmetics under a similarly worded name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search