Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PELOTON I N T E R A C T I V E, serial 85726791, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PELOTON I N T E R A C T I V ESerial 85726791 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Peloton Interactive LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 028 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Sep 12, 2012
The record shows that the mark “PELOTON I N T E R A C T I V E” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Peloton Interactive LLC, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of fitness‑related goods and services, including exercise bicycles, downloadable fitness software, streaming fitness classes, and fitness instruction services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the areas of exercise equipment, fitness software, and online fitness instruction. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “interactive” in unrelated contexts. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on June 23, 2014. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad fitness‑related scope still suggests a potential concern if the new use overlaps those services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.