Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PURPLE, serial 85727280, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PURPLESerial 85727280 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Purple Drink GmbH
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 033 -
Filed Sep 12, 2012
The record shows the application for “PURPLE” is dead – it was abandoned on Oct 11 2013 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Purple Drink GmbH, a German limited‑liability company. The filing covered Class 030 (flavorings for beverages, herbal infusions, tea and tea‑based drinks), Class 032 (carbonated waters, fruit nectars, isotonic drinks, soft drinks and syrups) and Class 033 (fruit‑flavored alcoholic beverages and extracts). A similar name used for any of those beverage‑related goods would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown. Because the mark never reached registration and is not on the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects a non‑final action and the subsequent abandonment; it does not confer any broader control over the word “PURPLE.” The latest status event is the abandonment notice dated Oct 11 2013, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand a beverage or related product with the same name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.