Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE, TRUE LOVE, serial 85729193, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE, TRUE LOVESerial 85729193 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: L.O.F.T.M., INC.
Class 014 -
Filed Sep 14, 2012
The record shows that the mark “LOVE, TRUE LOVE” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, L.O.F.T.M., INC., a corporation organized in North Carolina, failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after receiving a Notice of Allowance on July 1, 2014. The mark was filed on September 14, 2012 under an intent‑to‑use basis and was published for opposition on December 18, 2012. It covers a broad range of jewelry and related goods, including precious‑metal bracelets, amulets, and electronic‑chip bracelets designed to affect the wearer’s energy field. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the jewelry and personal‑accessory market, especially where the goods are marketed as “energy‑balancing” or “electronic‑chip” items. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “love” or “true love.” No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The latest status event is the abandonment on August 7, 2017. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk lies in the jewelry and personal‑accessory classes where the abandoned mark once had a presence.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.