Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOSTONE, serial 85733195, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOSTONESerial 85733195 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Panolam Industries International, Inc.
Class 017 -
Filed Sep 19, 2012
Registered Jan 21, 2014
The record shows that ECOSTONE is a cancelled Principal Register trademark owned by Panolam Industries International, Inc.; the cancellation was entered on August 28 2020 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered Class 017 goods described as “plastic decorative laminated sheets for building and construction of countertops, paneling, walls, tabletops, desktops, vanities, interior doors, cabinets, furniture, retail store fixtures, and drawer fronts.” A similar name would raise the closest concern if you are offering comparable building‑material panels or decorative laminates, because the record’s protection is limited to that specific description. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word ECOSTONE in unrelated fields. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only routine processing steps before the mark was allowed and later cancelled. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar laminated sheet products under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.