Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BRAZILIAN BEAUTY, serial 85756589, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BRAZILIAN BEAUTYSerial 85756589 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: PROJECT MIRACLE IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Oct 17, 2012
The record shows that the mark “BRAZILIAN BEAUTY” is dead on the Principal Register, having been abandoned because the owner, Project Miracle IP Holdings, LLC, did not file a Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance. The mark covered a narrow range of clothing goods, specifically baby bibs, beachwear, children’s headwear, coats, dresses, footwear, gloves, hosiery, infantwear, lingerie, neckwear, robes, scarves, shapewear, shirts, shorts, slacks, sleepwear, slippers, socks, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweaters, swimwear, t‑shirts, undergarments, and women’s athletic tops with built‑in bras. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the apparel and clothing sector, especially items listed above. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the phrase “Brazilian Beauty.” The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of extensions and a final abandonment, with no opposition, cancellation, or court action recorded. The last status event was the abandonment notice on January 5, 2015. For anyone looking to use a comparable name, the abandoned status means there is no active registration, but the specific clothing goods listed remain a potential point of concern if the new use overlaps those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.