Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for A HAND DRAWN TWO PETAL ROSE FLOWER WITH TWO HAND WRITTEN SMALL LETTER A'S AND ANOTHER LETTER A ON TOP OF THE SMALL ONE THAT FORM PART OF THE ROSE BUD. IN ADDITION, A SIGNATURE BEARING THE NAME ADLEYANNE WAS WRITTEN VERTICALLY ON THE BUD., serial 85767606, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
A HAND DRAWN TWO PETAL ROSE FLOWER WITH TWO HAND WRITTEN SMALL LETTER A'S AND ANOTHER LETTER A ON TOP OF THE SMALL ONE THAT FORM PART OF THE ROSE BUD. IN ADDITION, A SIGNATURE BEARING THE NAME ADLEYANNE WAS WRITTEN VERTICALLY ON THE BUD.
Serial 85767606 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Escosar, Veronica O
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed

The record shows that the mark is dead; the application was dismissed because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements, and the serial number was assigned in error. The owner listed is Veronica Escosar. The mark was applied for on the Principal Register for cosmetics and cleaning goods, including blush, compacts, eye makeup, and related products. A similar name used in the same or closely related cosmetic categories would raise the closest concern, while use in unrelated industries would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give control over every use of the wording. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the dismissal on November 9, 2012. Because the application was abandoned, there is no active registration to enforce, but the goods listed remain the area of potential concern for a similar name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search