Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FORTITECH QUALITY STANDARD · LEADERSHIP · CERTIFICATION · INTEGRITY ·, serial 85834943, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FORTITECH QUALITY STANDARD · LEADERSHIP · CERTIFICATION · INTEGRITY ·Serial 85834943 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: FORTITECH INC.
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Jan 29, 2013
The record shows that the mark “FORTITECH QUALITY STANDARD · LEADERSHIP · CERTIFICATION · INTEGRITY ·” is dead, having been abandoned by FORTITECH INC., a corporation organized in New York, after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on January 29, 2013 and was abandoned on December 17, 2013. It was registered on the Principal Register for class 005, covering mineral additives for foodstuffs and beverages, vitamin additives for foodstuffs and beverages, herbal extracts for medical purposes, amino acids for nutritional purposes, nucleotide preparations for use as nutritional foodstuffs, and nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement for human consumption. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the area of nutritional supplements and related food additives. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only covers the specific goods listed. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The practical risk for someone considering a similar name is that the abandoned status removes the immediate threat of infringement, but the goods listed remain a potential area of concern if the new name is used in the same or closely related categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.