Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOWERING LOTUS, serial 85847961, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWERING LOTUSSerial 85847961 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Sony Music Entertainment
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 12, 2013
The record shows that “FLOWERING LOTUS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after Sony Music Entertainment failed to file a required Statement of Use, with the abandonment notice mailed on April 14 2014; no later maintenance events appear. The filing covered a range of music‑related services, including musical sound recordings, audiovisual recordings, downloadable ringtones, streaming of audio and video, online retail of those recordings, and entertainment‑related website content, all listed in classes 009, 035, 038 and 041. Because the goods and services are centered on music and related digital entertainment, a similar name used for, say, a clothing line or restaurant would be farther from the scope shown here, while another music‑focused brand could run into the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Sony Music control over every possible use of the words “FLOWERING LOTUS,” only over the specific categories listed. No opposition, cancellation or court activity is visible in the history, so the supplied file shows no enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a music‑oriented brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.