Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for STREET LIGHTS, FORCE 4 TECH, WRIST RAY, CLIP 'N GO, FINGER FLARE, BRIGHT BRACELET, BRIGHT BAND, serial 85850718, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
STREET LIGHTS, FORCE 4 TECH, WRIST RAY, CLIP 'N GO, FINGER FLARE, BRIGHT BRACELET, BRIGHT BANDSerial 85850718 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Force 4 Tech, LLC
Class 011 -
Filed Feb 15, 2013
The record shows the application for “STREET LIGHTS, FORCE 4 TECH, WRIST RAY, CLIP ’N GO, FINGER FLARE, BRIGHT BRACELET, BRIGHT BAND” is abandoned, so it is not a live registration; the owner listed is Force 4 Tech, LLC, a Washington limited liability company. The goods are limited to “bright, rechargeable, portable, and personal hands‑free illumination devices … worn on the wrist, arm, fingers, and clothing, including caps, hats, and hoods,” which means a similar name used for lighting devices of that type would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give Force 4 Tech control over every use of those words in unrelated products or services. The prosecution history shows a series of Statement‑of‑Use extensions after the Notice of Allowance, but ultimately no use statement was filed and an abandonment notice was mailed on Oct 31 2016, which is the latest meaningful status event. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable wrist‑worn light product, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked those terms to that specific class of illumination devices.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.