Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP FICTION, serial 85883773, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULP FICTIONSerial 85883773 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Miramax, LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Filed Mar 22, 2013
Registered Oct 09, 2018
The record shows that “PULP FICTION” is a live Principal Register registration owned by Miramax, LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company, and it has been active since the Section 8 and 15 combined declaration was accepted on August 18, 2025. The registration covers a range of goods including magnets (class 009), ornamental pins for clothing (class 014), calendars, posters and printed matter (class 016), tote bags, wallets and card‑holder cases (class 018), cups and mugs (class 021), a full line of apparel such as T‑shirts, hoodies, caps, socks and costumes (class 025), and various toys and action‑figure items (class 028). A similar name used on products that fall within any of those categories would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those classes are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Pulp Fiction.” No prosecution history events are listed, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand similar merchandise.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.