Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GIG-IT, serial 85902235, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GIG-ITSerial 85902235 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Gigit Corp.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Apr 12, 2013
Registered Nov 26, 2013
The record shows that Gigit Corp.’s “GIG‑IT” mark is no longer active – it was cancelled under Section 18 by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on March 17 2018 after being registered on the Principal Register in November 2013. The registration covered computer‑application software for mobile phones, portable media players and handheld computers – specifically software for social gaming – in International Class 009, and advertising services in Class 035. A similar name used for software that enables social games on mobile devices or for advertising would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Gigit Corp. control over every possible use of the words “GIG‑IT.” No prosecution history or enforcement actions appear in the file, and the cancellation is the most recent meaningful event. I'd treat this as a notable concern if you plan a name that overlaps the same software or advertising services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.