Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPEL-LESS, serial 85926500, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPEL-LESSSerial 85926500 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Industries Software Development & Support, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 08, 2013
The record shows that PAPEL-LESS is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the owner, Industries Software Development & Support, Inc., failed to file a required Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance was issued, with the abandonment notice mailed on January 5 2015. The only goods listed are “computer software applications used for input, storage, management, and integration of customer data in an easy‑to‑use and understand user interface” in International Class 009, so a similar name would be most concerning if you’re offering comparable data‑management software. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “PAPEL‑LESS” in unrelated fields. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there’s no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on January 5 2015, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan software in the same class, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.