Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPERPILE, serial 85929783, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPERPILESerial 85929783 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: PAPERPILE LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 13, 2013
Registered Jun 03, 2014
The record shows that the mark “PAPERPILE” is no longer active; it was cancelled on December 13, 2024 because the registrant, PAPERPILE LLC, failed to file a required declaration. The mark had been registered on the Principal Register in June 2014 for services in class 042, specifically software‑as‑a‑service that provides database software for collecting, managing and citing research documents. A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in that same software‑as‑a‑service field, especially for research‑document management tools. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “paperpile” in other contexts. The prosecution history shows the mark was registered, then cancelled after the 10‑year Section 8 renewal was not filed. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone thinking of a similar name, the cancelled status means the mark no longer protects that specific software‑as‑a‑service use, but the earlier registration still signals that the owner once claimed rights in that narrow field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.