Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CXC CROSS COLOURS DIG IT·DIG IT·DIG IT CLOTHING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ACADEMIC HARDWEAR, serial 85937673, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CXC CROSS COLOURS DIG IT·DIG IT·DIG IT CLOTHING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ACADEMIC HARDWEARSerial 85937673 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: COLOURS LICENSING
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed May 21, 2013
The record shows that the mark “CXC CROSS COLOURS DIG IT·DIG IT·DIG IT CLOTHING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ACADEMIC HARDWARE” was abandoned by its owner, Colours Licensing, LLC, a California limited liability company, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance issued on October 10, 2017. The mark was never registered; it was only published for opposition and then allowed on the Principal Register before abandonment. The goods listed in class 025 cover a wide range of apparel and accessories, including socks, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats, and related items. A similar name used on clothing or related apparel would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of examination, amendment, and allowance, but no enforcement actions appear in the supplied documents. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark no longer has enforceable rights, yet the broad apparel coverage still suggests a potential risk if the name is used in that same market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.