Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PELOTON, serial 86010324, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PELOTONSerial 86010324 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Natus Medical Incorporated
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jul 15, 2013
Registered Dec 08, 2015
The record shows that the mark “PELOTON” is a dead, cancelled service mark owned by Natus Medical Incorporated, a Delaware corporation. It was registered on December 8, 2015 for medical and beauty services in the class 044, specifically in‑hospital medical screening services such as ambulatory testing, EEG testing, telemetric testing, metabolic testing, pulse oximetry testing and hearing loss testing, first used on October 31, 2013. Because the mark is cancelled, the owner no longer maintains the registration, but the history still indicates that the name was once protected for those specific health‑related services. The closest concern for a new name would be in the same field of medical screening and testing services; uses in unrelated industries would be farther from the scope shown. The latest status event was the cancellation on June 24, 2022, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk if the new use involves medical screening or testing services, but the cancellation reduces the likelihood of immediate infringement in other areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.