Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KILLER MANS SONS ESTABLISHED 1974 MC II, serial 86025304, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KILLER MANS SONS ESTABLISHED 1974 MC IISerial 86025304 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Killer Mans Sons Motorcycle Club
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jul 31, 2013
The record shows that the mark “KILLER MANS SONS ESTABLISHED 1974 MC II” is dead; it was abandoned because the applicant, Killer Mans Sons Motorcycle Club, a non‑profit corporation organized in Florida, failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on July 31, 2013 and abandoned on June 19, 2014. It was registered on the Principal Register for class 035, covering charitable services such as organizing volunteer programs and community service projects to support families of deceased war veterans, war veterans, current members and future members of the United States military. A similar name used in the same charitable or volunteer‑service context would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, especially outside this specific charitable‑service scope. No enforcement activity is visible in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific charitable‑service context remains a potential area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.