Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GABITAT, serial 86033487, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GABITATSerial 86033487 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Gabitat Incorporated
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 09, 2013
The record shows that the mark “GABITAT” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Gabitat Incorporated, a corporation organized in Canada, never filed a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered computer software and related cloud‑hosting services in class 009 and a broad range of computer‑services activities in class 042, all focused on integrating software applications into a shared business project workspace. A similar name would raise the closest concern for those same software‑integration and cloud‑hosting services, but the record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Gabitat.” The prosecution history shows a standard allowance followed by abandonment, with no opposition or enforcement actions recorded. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on October 27, 2014. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still shows a prior claim in the same technical field, so using the name for comparable software‑integration services could create a potential conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.