Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 86056022, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 86056022 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 014 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 04, 2013
Registered Aug 18, 2015
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is live and registered on the Principal Register, owned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a corporation organized in Korea. The registration covers a wide range of goods and services, including household appliances such as dishwashers, washing machines, refrigerators, and air conditioners, as well as electronic devices like smart watches, wearable mobile devices, and related software, and extends to communication and technology services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas of household appliances, consumer electronics, and related software and services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung” worldwide; it is limited to the classes listed. The most recent event is the renewal and acceptance of the 10‑year Section 8 and 9 filings on October 31, 2025, with the next renewal due in 2035. No oppositions, cancellations, or enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the risk is that use in the listed goods or services could be viewed as infringing, while use in unrelated areas may be less problematic.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.