Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 86056023, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 86056023 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 014 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 04, 2013
Registered Aug 18, 2015
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 86056023, owned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a corporation organized in Korea. The mark covers a wide range of goods and services, including household appliances such as dishwashers, washing machines, refrigerators, and air conditioners; electronic devices like smart watches, wearable mobile devices, and electric locks; and a broad array of communication and technology services such as broadcasting, internet communication, and software development. Because the mark is registered for these specific categories, a similar name used in any of these areas would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung” outside these goods or services. The most recent status event is the acceptance of Sections 8 and 15 on November 10, 2021, with no enforcement actions recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that use in any of the listed categories could be viewed as infringing, while use in unrelated fields may still pose a lesser concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.