Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOWER GROOVE, serial 86074035, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWER GROOVESerial 86074035 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Flower Orthopedics Corporation
Class 010 -
Filed Sep 25, 2013
The record shows that “FLOWER GROOVE” is an abandoned application, marked dead after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated August 6 2014; the owner listed is Flower Orthopedics Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation. The filing covered only Class 010 orthopedic implants—specifically plates—first used on September 4 2013, so a similar name would raise the closest concern for products in the medical‑device field, especially surgical hardware. The record does not give the owner any control over other goods, services, or unrelated industries, and it does not extend to general use of the words “flower” or “groove.” Because the mark never reached registration, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to explain. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on August 6 2014, and no further maintenance or renewal dates appear. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to market orthopedic plates under a similar name, but the risk is far lower for unrelated products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.