Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORION BAKERY SOLUTIONS, serial 86092149, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORION BAKERY SOLUTIONSSerial 86092149 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Lawrence Foods, Inc.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Oct 15, 2013
The record shows that the mark ORION BAKERY SOLUTIONS was filed by Lawrence Foods, Inc., a corporation organized in Illinois, on Oct 15 2013 but was abandoned on Aug 21 2014 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, so it is not live or registered. The application covered two classes: Class 029 for multi‑use food ingredients used by food‑service operators and in‑store bakeries such as fruit fillings, toppings, jellies, preserves, dessert‑pizza kits, cobbler kits, dips, garlic and cheese spreads, and bakery goods; and Class 030 for staple food mixes and bakery‑related sauces, dry mixes, brownie mixes, marshmallow and meringue powders, mousse parfait mixes, streusel and cobbler crumb toppings, cinnamon spreads, donut glazes, and icings for cakes, pies, donuts, fruits and bakery goods. Because the filing was abandoned, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Orion,” “Bakery,” or “Solutions,” but it does present a close concern for any new mark that also supplies similar bakery‑type ingredients or mixes. The prosecution history shows a non‑final office action in January 2014 followed by an abandonment notice in August 2014, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a name that targets the same bakery‑ingredient market.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.