Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 86095016, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 86095016 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung C&T Corporation
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 010 -
Class 012 -
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 18, 2013
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Samsung C&T Corporation, failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance on June 23 2015. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services, including chemicals, paints, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, automotive parts, textiles, clothing, electronics, advertising, insurance, travel, education, hospitality, and many other classes. The closest concern for a new name would arise in the same broad categories, especially where the goods or services overlap with those listed. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung” in all contexts. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of extension requests and a final abandonment, with no enforcement actions recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk in the listed classes, but no evidence of active enforcement.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.