Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NATTY NAT DA RAWEST FEMALE N DA DURTY SOUTH, serial 86106164, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NATTY NAT DA RAWEST FEMALE N DA DURTY SOUTHSerial 86106164 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Florance, Natalie A.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Oct 30, 2013
The record shows that the application for “NATTY NAT DA RAWEST FEMALE N DA DURTY SOUTH” is dead – it was abandoned on April 16 2015 after the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal, and the owner listed is Natalie A. Florance as an individual. The filing covered class 041 services, specifically arranging and conducting nightclub and special‑event entertainment, ticket‑reservation services, booking of entertainment halls, entertainment exhibitions, and ongoing television public‑service announcements and programs in the entertainment field. Because the protection is limited to those entertainment‑related services, a similar name used for unrelated goods—say clothing or food—would be farther from the scope shown here, though the same wording could still raise a concern if used in a comparable event‑planning context. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in September 2014 followed by an abandonment notice in April 2015; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan a name in the same entertainment‑service arena.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.