Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS, serial 86108271, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUSSerial 86108271 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: ONEPLUSTECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Filed Nov 01, 2013
Registered Sep 22, 2015
The record shows that ONEPLUS is a live Principal Register trademark owned by ONEPLUSTECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD., a corporation organized in China, and it was renewed as of the status date on Jan 02 2026. The registration covers a broad set of goods and services, most notably Class 009 items such as computers, computer peripherals, mobile phones, portable telephones, integrated circuits, GPS navigation devices and related accessories, as well as Class 035 advertising, business consulting, marketing research and related services, Class 037 repair and installation services for computers, phones, appliances and watches, and Class 038 communication services including cellular telephone communication, internet chatrooms and digital file transmission. Because the listed goods focus on electronic devices and related business and communication services, a similar name used for a smartphone, computer accessory or online advertising platform would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “ONEPLUS” in unrelated fields. No prosecution history is shown, and there are no visible enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same technology or advertising space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.